Compares the current normalized 20-day setup with every historical match.
Current setupHistorical similar setups (6)
What happened next?
5-day forward returns after historically similar setups.
Average Return25th - 75th Percentile
Historical Forward Return Distribution
5-day returns across the matched historical setup sample, grouped into return ranges.
Positive returnNegative return6 outcomes
Commentary
Negative historical skew with elevated downside risk on limited evidence
Similar setups appeared 6 times historically. Over the next 5 trading days, the setup finished lower 67% of the time with a median move of -4.9%. Results were moderately consistent across historical cases. Downside tail risk was high, with the worst historical outcome at -12.0%. The sample was limited, so this should be treated as weak historical evidence.
Distribution
The broad historical outcome range sat between -8.6% and +1.6%. Average return was -4.0%, compared with a median return of -4.9%.
Risk
Tail risk was significant. Similar setups occasionally produced sharp adverse outcomes, with the weakest historical case at -12.0% over 5 trading days.
Reliability
Historical evidence was limited because there were only 6 cases.
Match Quality
Historical matches were structurally strong, with a median quality score of 5/5 and median shape score of 5/5.
Historical Matches (6)
6 historical setups matched the current 20-day pattern.
Commentary
Negative historical skew with elevated downside risk on limited evidence
Similar setups appeared 6 times historically. Over the next 5 trading days, the setup finished lower 67% of the time with a median move of -4.9%. Results were moderately consistent across historical cases. Downside tail risk was high, with the worst historical outcome at -12.0%. The sample was limited, so this should be treated as weak historical evidence.