Compares the current normalized 20-day setup with every historical match.
Current setupHistorical similar setups (62)
What happened next?
5-day forward returns after historically similar setups.
Average Return25th - 75th Percentile
Historical Forward Return Distribution
5-day returns across the matched historical setup sample, grouped into return ranges.
Positive returnNegative return62 outcomes
Commentary
Moderately bullish skew with elevated downside risk
Similar setups appeared 62 times historically. Over the next 5 trading days, the setup finished higher 77% of the time with a median move of +1.7%. Results were moderately consistent across historical cases. Downside tail risk was high, with the worst historical outcome at -10.5%.
Distribution
The broad historical outcome range sat between -1.5% and +4.2%. Average return was +1.5%, compared with a median return of +1.7%.
Risk
Tail risk was significant. Similar setups occasionally produced sharp adverse outcomes, with the weakest historical case at -10.5% over 5 trading days.
Reliability
Historical evidence was relatively robust, based on 62 cases across a well-diversified set of historical matches.
Match Quality
Historical matches were structurally strong, with a median quality score of 5/5 and median shape score of 5/5.
Historical Matches (62)
62 historical setups matched the current 20-day pattern.
The largest upside move reached during the five-day forward window before it closed.
+14.20%
Max Adverse Excursion
-14.43%
Takeaway
Similar setups historically leaned positive over 5 trading days, but downside risk was large enough that position sizing and risk control would matter.
Commentary
Moderately bullish skew with elevated downside risk
Similar setups appeared 62 times historically. Over the next 5 trading days, the setup finished higher 77% of the time with a median move of +1.7%. Results were moderately consistent across historical cases. Downside tail risk was high, with the worst historical outcome at -10.5%.