20-day closing price history ending 2026-06-12.
Compares the current normalized 20-day setup with every historical match.
5-day forward returns after historically similar setups.
5-day returns across the matched historical setup sample, grouped into return ranges.
9 historical setups matched the current 20-day pattern.
| Match | Symbol | Historical Move | Similarity Score | Forward5D Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CTSHNASDAQCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 2016-02-232016-03-21 | 5.0 Shape5.0Trend5.0Volatility5.0Range Pos.4.0Volume5.0Risk5.0 | +3.53% |
| 2 | DTENYSEDTE Energy Company | 2018-10-172018-11-13 | 5.0 Shape5.0Trend5.0Volatility5.0Range Pos.3.0Volume5.0Risk5.0 | -1.21% |
| 3 | HONNASDAQHoneywell International Inc. | 2006-11-272006-12-22 | 5.0 Shape5.0Trend5.0Volatility5.0Range Pos.3.0Volume5.0Risk5.0 | +1.05% |
| 4 | SCHWNYSECharles Schwab Corporation | 2016-12-132017-01-11 | 5.0 Shape5.0Trend5.0Volatility5.0Range Pos.3.0Volume5.0Risk5.0 | +0.29% |
| 5 | DVANYSEDaVita Inc. | 2014-10-012014-10-28 | 5.0 Shape5.0Trend5.0Volatility5.0Range Pos.3.0Volume5.0Risk5.0 | +0.34% |
| 6 | MTDNYSEMettler-Toledo International Inc. | 2010-05-202010-06-17 | 5.0 Shape5.0Trend5.0Volatility4.0Range Pos.5.0Volume4.0Risk5.0 | -3.88% |
| 7 | MONYSEAltria Group, Inc. | 2017-10-192017-11-15 | 5.0 Shape5.0Trend5.0Volatility5.0Range Pos.4.0Volume5.0Risk5.0 | +0.35% |
| 8 | OMCNYSEOmnicom Group Inc. | 2016-02-232016-03-21 | 5.0 Shape5.0Trend5.0Volatility4.0Range Pos.3.0Volume5.0Risk5.0 | +1.62% |
| 9 | NEENYSENextEra Energy, Inc. | 2016-12-212017-01-20 | 5.0 Shape5.0Trend5.0Volatility3.0Range Pos.5.0Volume5.0Risk5.0 | +1.77% |
Showing 1-9 of 9 matches
Commentary
Mild bullish historical skew with elevated downside risk on limited evidence
Similar setups appeared 9 times historically. Over the next 5 trading days, the setup finished higher 78% of the time with a median move of +0.4%. Results were relatively consistent across historical cases. Downside risk was elevated, with the worst historical outcome at -3.9%. The sample was limited, so this should be treated as weak historical evidence.