Overview
- Historical Similar Setups
- 2since 2008
- Across
- 2different symbols
- Consistency
- High
- Reliability
- Low
Positive (5D)
0%Positive (5D)
- Avg. Return (5D)
- -3.30%
- Median Return (5D)
- -3.30%
- Best Return (5D)
- -0.20%
- Worst Return (5D)
- -6.39%
- Max Favourable Excursion
Commentary
Negative historical skew with elevated downside risk on limited evidence
Similar setups appeared 2 times historically. Over the next 5 trading days, the setup finished lower 100% of the time with a median move of -3.3%. Results were relatively consistent across historical cases. Downside tail risk was high, with the worst historical outcome at -6.4%. The sample was limited, so this should be treated as weak historical evidence.